As consumers are looking to reduce added sugar in their diets, the demand for products with less added sugar and more recognizable ingredients is growing. That's why many food and beverage brands are turning to natural sweeteners. But what exactly counts as a natural sweetener? And are all natural sweeteners the same?
What Are Natural Sweeteners?
Natural sweeteners are ingredients that provide sweetness and originate from natural sources, including plants, fruits, tree sap, or naturally occurring proteins. Depending on the ingredient, they may contain calories, contribute sugar, or provide sweetness with little to no calories.
Common examples of natural sweeteners include:
-
Honey
-
Maple syrup
-
Coconut sugar
-
Date syrup
-
Agave nectar
-
Sweet proteins
While there is no single regulatory definition of "natural sweetener," the term is generally used to describe ingredients that are sourced from nature rather than created through chemical synthesis.
It's also important to remember that natural doesn't automatically mean healthier or lower in calories. Some natural sweeteners behave much like sugar, while others provide intense sweetness in very small amounts.
What Are the Types of Natural Sweeteners?
Natural sweeteners generally fall into three categories, each offering different benefits for food and beverage formulation.
Traditional Sweeteners
These ingredients have been used for centuries and contribute both sweetness and calories.
Examples include:
-
Honey
-
Maple syrup
-
Agave nectar
-
Coconut sugar
-
Date syrup
Because these sweeteners contain sugars, they also contribute bulk, texture, browning, and moisture. They can be excellent choices for products where flavor and functionality are just as important as sweetness, though they typically don't help brands achieve significant sugar reduction.
High-Intensity Sweeteners
Some plants naturally contain compounds that are much sweeter than sugar.
The most common examples are stevia and monk fruit, both of which have become popular in reduced-sugar foods and beverages.
These ingredients offer several advantages:
-
Hundreds of times sweeter than sugar
-
Used in very small amounts
-
Can support low- or zero-sugar formulations
-
Suitable for many beverage and food applications
However, depending on the formulation, brands may need to manage challenges such as lingering sweetness or bitterness. Many manufacturers combine these sweeteners with other ingredients to create a more balanced taste profile.
Sweet Proteins
One of the newest categories of natural sweeteners is sweet proteins.
Unlike plant extracts, sweet proteins are naturally occurring proteins originally discovered in tropical fruits. They interact with the sweet taste receptors on the tongue, producing a sweet taste while being used in extremely small amounts.
Here at Oobli, we produce sweet proteins through precision fermentation, allowing them to be manufactured consistently and at commercial scale without relying on harvesting tropical fruit.
Sweet proteins offer several potential advantages for food and beverage brands:
-
Naturally occurring source of sweetness
-
Very low usage levels
-
Minimal impact on calories in finished products
-
Metabolically neutral
-
Sugar-like sweetness profile
-
Compatible with a wide range of food and beverage applications
As sugar reduction continues to evolve, sweet proteins are expanding the range of natural sweetening options available to formulators.
Are Natural Sweeteners Better Than Artificial Sweeteners?
One of the most common questions brands ask is whether natural sweeteners are better than artificial sweeteners.
The answer depends on your formulation goals. Both natural and artificial sweeteners can help reduce added sugar, but they differ in ingredient sourcing, taste profile, consumer perception, and labeling considerations.
Another common misconception is that only artificial sweeteners can provide sweetness without calories. In reality, there are several natural sweeteners with zero calories or little to no calories, including stevia, monk fruit, and sweet proteins. These ingredients give brands more options for reducing sugar while meeting consumer demand for naturally sourced ingredients.
When deciding between natural and artificial sweeteners, brands often consider factors such as:
-
Desired flavor profile
-
Consumer expectations
-
Product positioning
-
Regulatory requirements
-
Cost and formulation needs
Rather than asking which option is universally better, it's often more helpful to ask which ingredient best supports your specific product goals.
How Do Food and Beverage Brands Choose the Right Natural Sweeteners?
Selecting the right sweetener involves much more than sweetness alone. Formulators often evaluate several factors, including:
Taste
How closely does the sweetness resemble sugar? Does it have any bitterness, lingering sweetness, or off-notes?
Functionality
Sugar contributes more than sweetness. It also provides bulk, mouthfeel, moisture retention, browning, freezing point depression, and shelf-life benefits. Some natural sweeteners replace sweetness but not sugar's functional properties.
Calories and Sugar Reduction
Brands may be looking to reduce added sugar, lower calories, or both. While some natural sweeteners contribute calories, natural sweeteners with zero calories or little to no caloric impact, such as stevia, monk fruit, and sweet proteins, can help formulators reduce sugar without significantly affecting the calorie content of the finished product.
Label Appeal
Consumers increasingly seek recognizable ingredients and shorter ingredient lists, making ingredient sourcing and labeling an important consideration.
Application
The ideal sweetener often depends on the product itself. A beverage may require a different solution than yogurt, baked goods, confectionery, or protein powders.
The table below highlights some of the most common natural sweeteners and how they compare across key formulation considerations.
|
Sweetener |
Source |
Calories |
Relative Sweetness |
Common Applications |
Key Considerations |
|
Honey |
Bee-produced nectar |
Yes |
Similar to sugar |
Beverages, sauces, baked goods |
Adds flavor, moisture, and browning but also contributes added sugars |
|
Maple Syrup |
Maple tree sap |
Yes |
Similar to sugar |
Breakfast foods, beverages, baked goods |
Distinct flavor profile and functional properties |
|
Stevia |
Stevia rebaudiana plant |
Little to no calories |
200–300× sweeter than sugar |
Beverages, dairy, tabletop sweeteners |
May require blending to reduce bitterness or lingering sweetness |
|
Monk Fruit |
Monk fruit (Siraitia grosvenorii) |
Little to no calories |
150–250× sweeter than sugar |
Beverages, dairy, confectionery |
Often combined with other sweeteners for a balanced sweetness profile |
|
Sweet Proteins |
Naturally occurring proteins (commercially produced through precision fermentation) |
Little to no calories |
Hundreds to thousands of times sweeter than sugar, depending on the protein |
Beverages, dairy, nutrition products, confectionery |
Emerging ingredient category designed to help reduce sugar while maintaining a sugar-like taste |
How Are Sweet Proteins Expanding the Future of Natural Sweeteners?
Natural sweeteners have helped brands reduce sugar while meeting consumer demand for more recognizable ingredients. However, creating products that deliver the taste, texture, and overall experience consumers expect from sugar can still be challenging.
For many formulations, the best solution isn't a single sweetener, but a combination of ingredients working together. Sweet proteins add a new option to this evolving toolkit by complementing existing natural sweeteners like stevia and monk fruit to help create more balanced sweetness profiles.
By combining different sweetening technologies, brands can develop products that:
-
Reduce added sugar
-
Improve sweetness quality
-
Maintain a satisfying taste experience
-
Align with consumer preferences for naturally sourced ingredients
As the demand for reduced-sugar products continues to grow, sweet proteins are expanding the possibilities for food and beverage innovation.
Finding the Right Natural Sweetener for Your Product
There is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to natural sweeteners. Each ingredient offers a unique combination of taste, functionality, calorie contribution, and formulation considerations.
The right sweetener depends on your product goals, application, and the experience you want to deliver to consumers. By understanding the strengths and tradeoffs of each option, brands can build ingredient systems that support both great taste and evolving consumer expectations. For many formulators, sweet proteins represent an exciting new opportunity in sugar reduction.
Ready to explore what's possible with sweet proteins? Partner with Oobli to discover how our sweet protein technology can help you develop great-tasting, reduced-sugar food and beverage products.
FAQs
1. What counts as a natural sweetener?
Natural sweeteners come from naturally occurring sources like plants, fruits, or proteins. Examples include honey, stevia, monk fruit, and sweet proteins.
2. Are natural sweeteners better than artificial sweeteners?
It depends on the product and formulation goals. Natural and artificial sweeteners each have different benefits and considerations related to taste, labeling, and consumer preferences.
3. What are natural sweeteners with zero calories?
Stevia, monk fruit, and sweet proteins can provide sweetness with little to no calories, making them options for reduced-sugar product development.
4. Are stevia and monk fruit the same?
No. Stevia comes from the Stevia rebaudiana plant, while monk fruit comes from Siraitia grosvenorii. Both are plant-based sweeteners with unique taste profiles.
5. How are sweet proteins different from other natural sweeteners?
Sweet proteins are naturally occurring sweet-tasting proteins that offer a new approach to sugar reduction and can be combined with other natural sweeteners to create balanced sweetness profiles.